Context
The customer, network and operational question behind the work.
Customer results
Proof from real road-inspection workflows.
Inspech is used across concession, authority, municipal and engineering-provider contexts. The outcomes below show what changed in those specific workflows.
A-Lanes A15>50%
reported reduction in project lead time
Rijkswaterstaat · Unihorn≈80%
of the Dutch national highway network already inspected
DTAP · Malaysia>10,000
lane-km delivered in the first operational year
Evidence across operating contextsRoad concessionairesRoad authoritiesMunicipalitiesInspection & engineering providers
Evidence, not generic promises
Results presented with their operating context.
Inspection outcomes depend on network, method, data quality, team and project scope. We keep those conditions visible.
Workflow
How imagery, the platform and professional inspectors were used.
Result
What changed in that specific project or operating process.
Qualification
Clear attribution and boundaries around every stated outcome.
Important: Reported results reflect the cited customer and project context. They should not be interpreted as guaranteed outcomes for another organisation or network.
Featured concession evidenceA-Lanes A15 · The Netherlands
37 km motorwayAnnual contractual inspection workflow
Road concessionaire · DBFM
Consistent contractual inspection with a project lead-time reduction of more than half.
A-Lanes A15 needs to demonstrate that contractual requirements are met and prepare an annual asphalt-repair plan. Visual inspection is therefore a crucial part of the maintenance process.
HD road imagery and structured assessment in Inspech created a repeatable inspection record with results available for professional review and maintenance planning.
ChallengeAnnual compliance and repair planning
→WorkflowHD imagery and structured assessment
→Reported resultMore than 50% shorter lead time
Featured authority evidenceRijkswaterstaat · Unihorn · The Netherlands
Road authority and engineering partner
A national-scale inspection foundation across the Dutch highway network.
The joint Unihorn–Inspech proposition records that approximately 80% of the Dutch national highway network had already been inspected with Inspech.
The georeferenced evidence base combines Inspech’s scalable visual assessment environment with Unihorn’s professional inspection and engineering workflow—creating a practical foundation for recurring network intelligence.
Read the Dutch authority story
Dutch national highway networkDocumented Inspech inspection footprint
International authority delivery · Malaysia
Public Works Departments and municipalities served through DTAP.
Malaysian public-road clients receive structured, inspector-validated visual condition evidence through DTAP’s local Inspech-enabled delivery workflow.
Read the Malaysian authority story
Additional international authority story
TfNSW / AECOM: detailed corridor assessment without a traditional walk-over.
AECOM used vehicle-mounted imagery and Inspech to assess a 30 km corridor, reducing field exposure and reporting at least four weeks and AUD 20,000 in savings in that project context.
Read the TfNSW / AECOM storyFeatured provider evidenceUnihorn · The Netherlands
Professional pavement investigationInspech as step two of a broader process
Inspection & engineering provider
Visual assessment working alongside a complete pavement investigation.
Unihorn uses Inspech early in its professional workflow: after imagery collection and before radar, FWD, point-cloud, drilling and laboratory work.
Inspectors review and validate the visual assessment while the wider investigation and client advice remain under Unihorn’s professional direction.
01 · Data collection→02 · Inspech analysis→03–10 · Investigation to execution
“With Inspech, we finally have the overview we always wanted, without losing human expertise.”Jeroen Bleeker · Director, UnihornRead the Unihorn story
Additional regional scale evidence · Malaysia
DTAP: more than 10,000 lane-km in the first operational year.
The customer-supplied result covers aggregate DTAP delivery across client work. Its Malaysian end-client context includes Public Works Departments and municipalities.
>10,000 lane-kmRead the DTAP story
Municipal experience
More usable oversight across public-road networks.
For municipal teams, the value is often practical: making a larger or distributed network easier to inspect, review and plan with the available capacity.
Municipality of BredaRural road network
A consistent view beyond the city boundary.
Breda used digitally assisted visual assessment to create a detailed, georeferenced overview of rural roads, supporting professional inspection capacity and maintenance planning.
Read the Breda story
Municipality of MedemblikExpanded road network
Supporting a larger network with the same team.
Medemblik needed an efficient way to understand an expanded road network. A georeferenced digital inspection environment helped the team process information faster and maintain a usable overview.
Read the Medemblik storyWhat the evidence demonstrates
Different contexts. A common operational pattern.
Structured imagery, AI assistance and professional validation create value in different ways depending on the customer workflow.
A-Lanes A15
Shorter lead time
A repeatable digital workflow supported a reported project lead-time reduction of more than half.
Rijkswaterstaat · Unihorn
National-scale evidence
Approximately 80% of the Dutch national highway network had already been inspected with Inspech.
DTAP · Malaysia
Operational inspection scale
More than 10,000 lane-km were delivered in the first year after Inspech became part of DTAP’s operational workflow.
Breda · Medemblik
Inspection capacity
Municipal teams used digital visual assessment to create and maintain a more usable network overview.
Build your own evidence
Define success before the evaluation begins.
An Operational Validation uses a representative route, compatible imagery, the applicable inspection method and your own professionals to test fit in your context.
Agree the evidence criteria
- Workflow and imagery compatibility
- Inspector effort and consistency
- Standards and validation ownership
- Outputs and system fit
- Operational value and potential cadence